Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Skip to main content

US businesses unite against EPAÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s new ozone rules

 

World Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­,

The American Petroleum Institute (API), along with more than other 170 businesses and business groups that together employ millions of American workers, have sent a letter to President Obama urging him to stop the Environmental Protection AgencyÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s (EPA) voluntary reconsideration of new National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground level ozone.

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­˜The president has a chance to show heÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s serious about his stated goal of improving regulations and creating jobs,Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™ said Howard Feldman, API director of regulatory and scientific policy. Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­˜Air quality has and continues to improve under existing ozone standards: there's no need to move the goalposts now in the middle of the game. Changing the standards now would put nearly the entire country into non-compliance and force millions more Americans out of work, but it wouldnÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™t make us any healthier.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™

In the letter the groups said: Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­˜now is not the time to saddle our economy with the extraordinary costs associated with EPAÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s proposed national ozone standard,Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™ while asking President Obama to Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­˜delay this discretionary, out of cycle ozone standard and wait until 2013 before determining whether a new standard is needed.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™

Feldman cited a study by Manufacturing Alliance/MAPI showing that 7.3 million jobs could be lost by 2020 if EPA moves forward to a strict new ozone standard. He also cited a recent study by NERA Economic Consulting that concluded, Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­˜not one of EPAÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s estimates of the benefits of reducing ozone to a tighter alternative ozone standard is as large as the costs of attaining that respective ozone standard.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™