Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Skip to main content

Tug of war: Energy East pipeline causing a stir

 

Published by
World Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­,

The Mayor of Montreal, Denis Coderre, has caused quite a stir on 21 January after slamming TransCanadaÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s Energy East pipeline project. Montreal Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­“ and 81 neighbouring communities Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­“ united against the pipeline project, citing environmental and economic concerns.

Coderre comments

Coderre explained that the potential environmental damages outweigh the economic benefits of the pipeline project, stating: Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­œTransCanadaÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s project includes important risks for our environment and too few benefits for our economy.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Coderre continued: Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­œThe Montreal Metropolitan Community (MMC) is against the Energy East pipeline project because it still represents a serious environmental threat, with too little economic benefits for the greater Montreal region. The project would create only 30 jobs for all of Quebec and financial benefits of CAN$2 million/y according to Transport Canada estimates and internal analyses. TransCanada says the project will bring in CAN$2 billion over 20 years to Quebec. In comparison, the cost of a major spill in the greater Montreal region could run between CAN$1 billion and CAN$10 billion. WhatÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s more, the proposed path would cross urban forests, wetlands and agriculture zones, and destroy 130 ha. of forested land.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

The project

TransCanadaÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s proposed 4600 km and CAN$15.7 billion Energy East pipeline is set to transport 1.1 million bpd of oil from the Alberta oilsands and Saskatchewan, to the East Coast. However, at present, it is in the midst of political problems, including environmentalists and aboriginal groups protesting against the project.

Adam Scott, Environmental Defence Spokesman, simply stated: "Facing growing opposition, TransCanada's Energy East project appears to be dead in the water, even before the regulatory review has started."

Conflicting ideologies

Conversely, Brian Jean Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­“ Leader of the Wildrose Party Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­“ labelled Coderre a hypocrite, referring to MontrealÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s decision to deposit one-third of its sewage into the St. Lawrence River in Autumn 2015.

"While Mr. Coderre dumps a billion litres of raw sewage directly into his waterways and benefits from billions in equalisation payments, his opposition to the Energy East pipeline is nothing short of hypocritical. Montreal buys millions of barrels of foreign oil from dictatorships, but it is rejecting oil from their friends in confederation Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­“ it's disgraceful!Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Actions taken

Tim Duboyce, a TransCanada spokesman, stated that the company has already filed 700 amendments to the pipeline project, in order to deal with the concerns raised. Calgary-based TransCanada is anticipating hearings in 2016 and the National Energy BoardÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s (NEB) final report to be published in 2017. However, no official deadline or date has been decided upon.

Edited from various sources by

Sources: , , , , ,

 

Energy East: a debate amongst Quebecers

The majority of Quebecers oppose TransCanadaÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s Energy East pipeline and want the review process to be stopped.

Another pipeline halted for TransCanada

The NEB has stopped construction on a new TransCanada natural gas pipeline and issued a safety order after evidence arose of drilling fluid being spilled into a river.

Energy East pipeline: the safest way to transport crude?

CanadaÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s Energy East pipeline remains the safest way of transporting crude oil to the market, remaining committed to reducing environmental impacts and increasing safety on operations.