Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Skip to main content

Vancouver challenges NEBÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s Trans Mountain approval

 

Published by
World Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­,

Vancouver (Canada) has recently joined other cities in challenging the National Energy BoardÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s (NEB) recommendation to approve Kinder MorganÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s CAN$6.8 billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project.

VancouverÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s Mayor, Gregor Robertson, stated that the NEB had disregarded key evidence that demonstrates the potential damage to the regional waters should an oil spill occur, as well as the impact an additional or expanded pipeline would have on greenhouse gas emissions.

Robertson stated: Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­œThe NEB failed to properly and thoroughly consult local communities on the pipeline and tanker route, ignoring key pieces of scientific evidence showing the potential for real and catastrophic damage to local waters in the event of an oil spill, and the impact of an expanded pipeline on greenhouse gas emissions both locally and abroad. Vancouver still has significant concerns about Kinder MorganÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s expansion and weÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™ve concluded itÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s simply not worth the risk to our environment or economy.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

He concluded by noting that Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­œan expanded Kinder Morgan pipeline is not in Vancouver or CanadaÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s economic or environmental interest.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

The city wrote, in its statement to the Federal Court of Appeal, that the NEB Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­œexcluded any opportunities for oral cross-examination of experts and evidence; provided inadequate information sharing; and failed to properly consult affected communities along the pipeline and tanker route.Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Additionally, Vancouver has requested that the federal government not make a decision on the pipeline project until the NEB carried out a lawful review.

The NEB has not commented on the cityÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­™s application. Additionally, a decision from the court has not yet been made.

Edited from various sources by

Sources: ,